<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>let x=x &#187; mysql</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crazymcphee.net/x/tag/mysql/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crazymcphee.net/x</link>
	<description>programming idiom and methodology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 09:36:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Oracle to buy Sun &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.crazymcphee.net/x/2009/04/20/oracle-to-buy-sun/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crazymcphee.net/x/2009/04/20/oracle-to-buy-sun/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 13:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scot Mcphee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glassfish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mysql]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wizards considered harmful]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crazymcphee.net/x/?p=329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, it&#8217;s true. Oracle and Sun have both announced the marriage. Techcrunch has the full press release. ZDnet some other commentary. A few people seem to be sweating about MySQL. It would not be stressing about MySQL too much. It could get spun off, who knows. It&#8217;s even possible, as some commenters on Techcrunch say, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it&#8217;s true. Oracle and Sun have both announced the marriage. <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/20/oracle-to-buy-sun-hold-on-to-your-hats/" target="_blank">Techcrunch</a> has the full press release. <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=16598" target="_blank">ZDnet</a> some other commentary.</p>
<p>A few people seem to be sweating about MySQL. It would not be stressing about MySQL too much. It could get spun off, who knows. It&#8217;s even possible, as some commenters on Techcrunch say, that Oracle might use the free MySQL offering to hammer Microsoft&#8217;s database market from the bottom-up</p>
<p>It&#8217;s more touch-and-go in the app-server market (what Oracle likes to call &#8216;middleware&#8217;) which is already suffering a little from Oracle&#8217;s transition over to BEA Weblogic from its older products. Sun has excellent products in that area, i.e. Glassfish. I have used all of these products (plus Websphere and JBoss) and Glassfish is <em>easily</em> the nicest (in fact I would say it&#8217;s the best app-server I&#8217;ve used, apart from plain old Tomcat).</p>
<p>And what will happen to Java? Of course, Oracle wants Java, that&#8217;s part of the reason they are buying Sun in the first place (as well as their hardware business). But will IBM play along now it&#8217;s most critical competitor owns Java (and IBM has previously bet its software integration farm on the Java stack)? And what of the JCP?</p>
<p>Even more worrying for some, is what will happen in the IDE space. Of course, I&#8217;m a confirmed Eclipse man, but it is always a worry when competition is reduced. What will happen to Netbeans? And dare I say it &#8230; JDeveloper is fairly horrible compared to Netbeans but will that save either of them? Oracle&#8217;s got a lot invested into it&#8217;s tooling, which all runs on JDeveloper. As much as I prefer to just write <em>code</em>, that use <em>wizards</em>, Oracle does seem to have at least some customers in that area. Oracle&#8217;s development model tends to focus a <a href="http://www.crazymcphee.net/x/2009/02/14/gui-builders-modern-development-practices-and-vendor-lock-in/">little too much on magic wizards</a>. From the IDE-JDeveloper-to-the-app-server single click-to-deploy, drag-and-drop to create-the-control, easy-peasy wizardry, which I hate, because I think it gets in the way of <em>craftmanship</em>. It&#8217;s the Bunnings Warehouse of software development. Show me the command-line Oracle! you should remember, that Sun is most definitely a company built around the Unix shell prompt. Even with Oracle middleware, it&#8217;s definitely possible, I&#8217;ve just been working on command-line deployment automation for their older Orion-based app-server, they just don&#8217;t like to promote it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m hoping that Sun can reverse-ferret them on that score and teach them about <em>Ant</em>, <em>Maven</em>, <em>/bin/sh</em> and the goodness of installations that are as simple as <em>tar xcf </em>in the spot you want to install it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crazymcphee.net/x/2009/04/20/oracle-to-buy-sun/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Open source and profits</title>
		<link>http://www.crazymcphee.net/x/2009/01/29/open-source-and-profits/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crazymcphee.net/x/2009/01/29/open-source-and-profits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 05:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scot Mcphee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infrastructure and frameworks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glassfish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mysql]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opensource]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sun]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crazymcphee.net/x/?p=108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sun&#8217;s sales topped estimates, according to Bloomberg, and this was all thanks to its open source software strategy, according to Matt Asay at CNET: Sun Microsystems is getting some love from Wall Street after its sales and earnings topped estimates, as detailed by Bloomberg. Software sales jumped 21 percent year-over-year. What is fueling the growth? [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sun&#8217;s sales topped estimates, according to <a title="Bloomberg's report on Sun's result" href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aTpPkrKPME1g&amp;refer=home" target="_blank">Bloomberg</a>, and this was all thanks to its <em>open source software strategy</em>, according to Matt Asay at CNET:</p>
<blockquote><p>Sun Microsystems is getting some love from Wall Street after its sales and earnings topped estimates, as detailed by Bloomberg. Software sales jumped 21 percent year-over-year.</p>
<p>What is fueling the growth? The same thing that Sun CEO Jonathan Schwartz has doggedly said would lift Sun&#8217;s fortunes again: open source.</p>
<p>via <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13505_3-10152077-16.html#">Open source makes Sun&#8217;s quarter shine | The Open Road &#8211; CNET News</a>.</p></blockquote>
<p>If this approach is validated going forward the next year or two, will it change the software industry radically? Quite possibly. Remember this is not a five-man company selling training and consultancy services leveraged off it&#8217;s founders&#8217; successful open source software effort, nor even a much larger company set up solely to market and sell services and support contracts based around packaged open source distributions. Sun is a <em>big vendor</em>, which has had to turn its ship of business around almost 180 degrees to get where it&#8217;s going now. And maybe, just <em>maybe</em>, it&#8217;s on a winning course now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crazymcphee.net/x/2009/01/29/open-source-and-profits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

